Attacking Mark Levin
On Brit Hume's Political Grapevine last night he reported this:
NPR: "We Regret Any Error or Confusion"
A National Public Radio host said, "a book by a conservative commentator ... has leveled ... charges [similar]" to those by Republicans that judicial activist judges bring violence upon themselves. But the book, "Men in Black" by Mark Levin, never says that. NPR now says it was just "turn[ing] to a critique of the book" from a previous subject, and "we regret any error or confusion.
NPR: "We Regret Any Error or Confusion"
A National Public Radio host said, "a book by a conservative commentator ... has leveled ... charges [similar]" to those by Republicans that judicial activist judges bring violence upon themselves. But the book, "Men in Black" by Mark Levin, never says that. NPR now says it was just "turn[ing] to a critique of the book" from a previous subject, and "we regret any error or confusion.
posted by John Ottinger III (Grasping for the Wind) | 11:38 AM
3 Comments:
George, where have you been publishing your critiques of Levin that NPR is gleaning from them!?
I am a fan of Levin - not a critique, boy.
lol... a fan and a comedian, evidently. BTW, Critique: a serious examination and judgment of something or appraise critically. It doesn't have to be negative. You can be a fan and critique something. Although, I would categorize myself as a "critiquer" of Levin who is not a big fan.
His moral is excellent, non-left-right divisive (I'm still going to post on this at some point) and needs to be heard by as many people as possible. But his extreme take politically in portraying the moral makes it difficult to impossible for someone in your position to take it seriously. That is a significant flaw in my mind.
Post a Comment
<< Home